↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane method for systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss – abridged

Overview of attention for article published in CoDAS, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cochrane method for systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss – abridged
Published in
CoDAS, January 2020
DOI 10.1590/2317-1782/20192019127
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Tikka, Jos Verbeek, Erik Kateman, Thais Catalani Morata, Wouter Dreschler, Silvia Ferrite

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 37%
Engineering 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#13,370,593
of 17,436,984 outputs
Outputs from CoDAS
#120
of 276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,548
of 280,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CoDAS
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,436,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 276 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them