You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Explaining mass balance and retreat dichotomies at Taku and Lemon Creek Glaciers, Alaska
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Glaciology, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1017/jog.2020.22 |
Authors |
Christopher McNeil, Shad O'Neel, Michael Loso, Mauri Pelto, Louis Sass, Emily H. Baker, Seth Campbell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 38% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 23% |
Researcher | 5 | 13% |
Professor | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 16 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 48% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 18 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,536,914
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Glaciology
#69
of 1,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,540
of 374,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Glaciology
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.