You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Exploring the Free Energy Landscape: From Dynamics to Networks and Back
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, June 2009
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000415 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Diego Prada-Gracia, Jesús Gómez-Gardeñes, Pablo Echenique, Fernando Falo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 5% |
Germany | 5 | 3% |
Spain | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Sweden | 2 | 1% |
Canada | 2 | 1% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Other | 9 | 5% |
Unknown | 142 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 57 | 32% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 28% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 8% |
Student > Master | 12 | 7% |
Professor | 11 | 6% |
Other | 21 | 12% |
Unknown | 12 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 43 | 24% |
Physics and Astronomy | 34 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 19% |
Engineering | 11 | 6% |
Computer Science | 9 | 5% |
Other | 32 | 18% |
Unknown | 15 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#17,396,702
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#7,506
of 8,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,201
of 123,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#38
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.