You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical effectiveness of a web-based peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar (REACT): online, observer-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12888-020-02545-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona Lobban, Nadia Akers, Duncan Appelbe, Lesley Chapman, Lizzi Collinge, Susanna Dodd, Sue Flowers, Bruce Hollingsworth, Sonia Johnson, Steven H. Jones, Ceu Mateus, Barbara Mezes, Elizabeth Murray, Katerina Panagaki, Naomi Rainford, Heather Robinson, Anna Rosala-Hallas, William Sellwood, Andrew Walker, Paula Williamson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 56% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 36% |
| Scientists | 12 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 31% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 114 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 55 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 16% |
| Psychology | 11 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 56 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,271,026
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#384
of 5,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,555
of 403,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#19
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.