↓ Skip to main content

Viral metagenomic analysis of chickens with runting-stunting syndrome in the Republic of Korea

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
Title
Viral metagenomic analysis of chickens with runting-stunting syndrome in the Republic of Korea
Published in
Virology Journal, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12985-020-01307-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hye-Ryoung Kim, Yong-Kuk Kwon, Il Jang, You-Chan Bae

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#9,052,525
of 15,449,150 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#1,182
of 2,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,565
of 223,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,449,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,393 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them