↓ Skip to main content

Bench-to-bedside review: Understanding genetic predisposition to sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bench-to-bedside review: Understanding genetic predisposition to sepsis
Published in
Critical Care, April 2004
DOI 10.1186/cc2863
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesús Villar, Nicole Maca-Meyer, Lina Pérez-Méndez, Carlos Flores

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 100 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 17%
Other 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Professor 9 8%
Other 30 27%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 15 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.
All research outputs
#725,980
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#514
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#771
of 62,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.