You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Bt Crops on Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001415 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jian J. Duan, Michelle Marvier, Joseph Huesing, Galen Dively, Zachary Y. Huang |
| Abstract |
Honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) are the most important pollinators of many agricultural crops worldwide and are a key test species used in the tiered safety assessment of genetically engineered insect-resistant crops. There is concern that widespread planting of these transgenic crops could harm honey bee populations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 12% |
| Chile | 3 | 9% |
| Mexico | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 91% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 8 | 3% |
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 279 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 50 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 11% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 81 | 26% |
| Unknown | 34 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 175 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 32 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Unknown | 51 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#470,945
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,542
of 224,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,060
of 170,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#5
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.