You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CoproID predicts the source of coprolites and paleofeces using microbiome composition and host DNA content
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PeerJ, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.7717/peerj.9001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maxime Borry, Bryan Cordova, Angela Perri, Marsha Wibowo, Tanvi Prasad Honap, Jada Ko, Jie Yu, Kate Britton, Linus Girdland-Flink, Robert C. Power, Ingelise Stuijts, Domingo C. Salazar-García, Courtney Hofman, Richard Hagan, Thérèse Samdapawindé Kagoné, Nicolas Meda, Helene Carabin, David Jacobson, Karl Reinhard, Cecil Lewis, Aleksandar Kostic, Choongwon Jeong, Alexander Herbig, Alexander Hübner, Christina Warinner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 11 | 15% |
| United States | 10 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Sweden | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 41 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 64% |
| Scientists | 25 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 362. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#89,862
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#111
of 15,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,219
of 404,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#2
of 441 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 441 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.