You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consumption and biochemical impact of commercially available plant-derived nutritional supplements. An observational pilot-study on recreational athletes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-9-28 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paolo Borrione, Marta Rizzo, Federico Quaranta, Emanuela Ciminelli, Federica Fagnani, Attilio Parisi, Fabio Pigozzi |
| Abstract |
A growing consumption of natural (plant-derived) dietary supplements with ergogenic aims, with particular regard for ecdysteroids, phytoestrogens and vegetal sterols, has been registered over the last years among "recreational" athletes. The present study was carried out in order to evaluate the real knowledge of plant-derived nutritional supplements among physically active people as well as their real consumption. Additional aim was to evaluate the effects of these supplements on the health profile of the users. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 53% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 19% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 12 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2012.
All research outputs
#2,289,606
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#434
of 892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,658
of 442,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#418
of 851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.