↓ Skip to main content

Comparative pathogenesis of COVID-19, MERS, and SARS in a nonhuman primate model

Overview of attention for article published in Science, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
962 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
4 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
592 Mendeley
Title
Comparative pathogenesis of COVID-19, MERS, and SARS in a nonhuman primate model
Published in
Science, April 2020
DOI 10.1126/science.abb7314
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barry Rockx, Thijs Kuiken, Sander Herfst, Theo Bestebroer, Mart M. Lamers, Bas B. Oude Munnink, Dennis de Meulder, Geert van Amerongen, Judith van den Brand, Nisreen M. A. Okba, Debby Schipper, Peter van Run, Lonneke Leijten, Reina Sikkema, Ernst Verschoor, Babs Verstrepen, Willy Bogers, Jan Langermans, Christian Drosten, Martje Fentener van Vlissingen, Ron Fouchier, Rik de Swart, Marion Koopmans, Bart L. Haagmans

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 962 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 592 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 592 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 120 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 12%
Student > Bachelor 71 12%
Student > Master 59 10%
Other 32 5%
Other 126 21%
Unknown 112 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 78 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 61 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 32 5%
Other 133 22%
Unknown 142 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 810. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#10,030
of 16,094,275 outputs
Outputs from Science
#636
of 68,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#806
of 280,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#44
of 930 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,094,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 930 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.