↓ Skip to main content

Comparative pathogenesis of COVID-19, MERS, and SARS in a nonhuman primate model

Overview of attention for article published in Science, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
26 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
863 X users
patent
6 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
834 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1165 Mendeley
Title
Comparative pathogenesis of COVID-19, MERS, and SARS in a nonhuman primate model
Published in
Science, April 2020
DOI 10.1126/science.abb7314
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barry Rockx, Thijs Kuiken, Sander Herfst, Theo Bestebroer, Mart M Lamers, Bas B Oude Munnink, Dennis de Meulder, Geert van Amerongen, Judith van den Brand, Nisreen M A Okba, Debby Schipper, Peter van Run, Lonneke Leijten, Reina Sikkema, Ernst Verschoor, Babs Verstrepen, Willy Bogers, Jan Langermans, Christian Drosten, Martje Fentener van Vlissingen, Ron Fouchier, Rik de Swart, Marion Koopmans, Bart L Haagmans

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 863 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1165 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 200 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 128 11%
Student > Bachelor 122 10%
Student > Master 114 10%
Other 66 6%
Other 214 18%
Unknown 321 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 148 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 148 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 126 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 46 4%
Other 223 19%
Unknown 379 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 806. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#23,795
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,097
of 83,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,129
of 404,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#61
of 959 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 959 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.