| Title |
Smell dysfunction: a biomarker for COVID‐19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/alr.22587 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shima T. Moein, Seyed MohammadReza Hashemian, Babak Mansourafshar, Ali Khorram‐Tousi, Payam Tabarsi, Richard L. Doty |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 15 | 14% |
| United States | 14 | 13% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 56 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 80 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 13% |
| Scientists | 9 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 769 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 769 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 106 | 14% |
| Researcher | 79 | 10% |
| Other | 58 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 57 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 53 | 7% |
| Other | 169 | 22% |
| Unknown | 247 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 226 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 36 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 4% |
| Other | 132 | 17% |
| Unknown | 273 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 564. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#42,990
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
#4
of 1,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,861
of 435,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
#3
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.