↓ Skip to main content

Identification of functionally-distinct macrophage subpopulations regulated by efferocytosis in Drosophila

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of functionally-distinct macrophage subpopulations regulated by efferocytosis in Drosophila
Published in
bioRxiv, April 2020
DOI 10.1101/2020.04.17.047472
Authors

Jonathon Alexis Coates, Amy Brittle, Emma Louise Armitage, Martin Peter Zeidler, Iwan Robert Evans

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Mathematics 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,052,319
of 17,939,930 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#14,810
of 124,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,925
of 285,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#1,004
of 8,369 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,939,930 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8,369 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.