↓ Skip to main content

Plasmodium vivax lineages: geographical distribution, tandem repeat polymorphism, and phylogenetic relationship

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plasmodium vivax lineages: geographical distribution, tandem repeat polymorphism, and phylogenetic relationship
Published in
Malaria Journal, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-10-374
Pubmed ID
Authors

Surendra K Prajapati, Hema Joshi, Sneh Shalini, Manuel A Patarroyo, Rossarin Suwanarusk, Ashwani Kumar, Surya K Sharma, Alex Eapen, Vas Dev, Rajendra M Bhatt, Neena Valecha, Francois Nosten, Moshahid A Rizvi, Aditya P Dash

Abstract

Multi-drug resistance and severe/complicated cases are the emerging phenotypes of vivax malaria, which may deteriorate current anti-malarial control measures. The emergence of these phenotypes could be associated with either of the two Plasmodium vivax lineages. The two lineages had been categorized as Old World and New World, based on geographical sub-division and genetic and phenotypical markers. This study revisited the lineage hypothesis of P. vivax by typing the distribution of lineages among global isolates and evaluated their genetic relatedness using a panel of new mini-satellite markers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
France 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
Philippines 1 1%
Unknown 66 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Other 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 16%
Computer Science 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 14 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,414,160
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,438
of 5,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,469
of 242,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#37
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.