↓ Skip to main content

Type of anaesthesia and the safety and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin or dabigatran etexilate in major orthopaedic surgery: pooled analysis of three randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Thrombosis Journal, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Type of anaesthesia and the safety and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin or dabigatran etexilate in major orthopaedic surgery: pooled analysis of three randomized controlled trials
Published in
Thrombosis Journal, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1477-9560-10-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadia Rosencher, Herbert Noack, Martin Feuring, Andreas Clemens, Richard J Friedman, Bengt I Eriksson

Abstract

There has been a shift towards greater use of neuraxial over general anaesthesia for patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty. Furthermore, suggestions that peripheral nerve block may reduce adverse effects have recently been put forward. Although older studies showed a reduction in venous thromboembolism (VTE) with neuraxial compared with general anaesthesia, this difference has not been confirmed in studies using effective current thromboprophylaxis. We used a large data set to investigate the pattern of anaesthesia usage, and whether anaesthesia type affects efficacy and bleeding outcomes of thromboprophylaxis overall, within each treatment group, or for the novel oral anticoagulant dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Slovenia 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 12 29%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 54%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 22%