| Title |
The effectiveness of continuous quality improvement for developing professional practice and improving health care outcomes: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-020-0975-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James E. Hill, Anne-Marie Stephani, Paul Sapple, Andrew J. Clegg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 15% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 55% |
| Scientists | 11 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 322 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 8% |
| Researcher | 19 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 50 | 16% |
| Unknown | 153 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 44 | 14% |
| Unknown | 162 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,376,115
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#231
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,342
of 404,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.