You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Posturographic measures did not improve the predictive power to identify recurrent falls in community-dwelling elderly fallers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1409 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelem de Negreiros Cabral, Guilherme Carlos Brech, Angelica Castilho Alonso, Aline Thomaz Soares, Davi Camara Opaleye, Julia Maria D'Andrea Greve, Wilson Jacob-Filho |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 9% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2020.
All research outputs
#22,771,990
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#1,001
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#344,088
of 398,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#20
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.