↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide association studies and Mendelian randomization analyses for leisure sedentary behaviours

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
64 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
Title
Genome-wide association studies and Mendelian randomization analyses for leisure sedentary behaviours
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-15553-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yordi J. van de Vegte, M. Abdullah Said, Michiel Rienstra, Pim van der Harst, Niek Verweij

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2020.
All research outputs
#156,997
of 15,606,445 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#2,436
of 29,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,921
of 277,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,606,445 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them