↓ Skip to main content

Why physicians and nurses ask (or don’t) about partner violence: a qualitative analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why physicians and nurses ask (or don’t) about partner violence: a qualitative analysis
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-473
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlene E Beynon, Iris A Gutmanis, Leslie M Tutty, C Nadine Wathen, Harriet L MacMillan

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) against women is a serious public health issue and is associated with significant adverse health outcomes. The current study was undertaken to: 1) explore physicians' and nurses' experiences, both professional and personal, when asking about IPV; 2) determine the variations by discipline; and 3) identify implications for practice, workplace policy and curriculum development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 186 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 48 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 47 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 23%
Social Sciences 19 10%
Psychology 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 52 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2012.
All research outputs
#5,474,257
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,375
of 14,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,001
of 164,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#70
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.