You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Broadening risk profile in familial colorectal cancer type X; increased risk for five cancer types in the national Danish cohort
BMC Cancer, April 2020
Christina Therkildsen, Maria Rasmussen, Lars Smith-Hansen, Thomas Kallemose, Lars Joachim Lindberg, Mef Nilbert
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||75%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||25%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||2||9%|
|Student > Master||2||9%|
|Lecturer > Senior Lecturer||1||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||7||32%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||3||14%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,203,401 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
of 8,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 375,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,203,401 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.