↓ Skip to main content

The Protective Role of Racial Identity and Africentric Worldview in the Association Between Racial Discrimination and Blood Pressure

Overview of attention for article published in Psychosomatic Medicine, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Protective Role of Racial Identity and Africentric Worldview in the Association Between Racial Discrimination and Blood Pressure
Published in
Psychosomatic Medicine, June 2012
DOI 10.1097/psy.0b013e3182583a50
Pubmed ID
Authors

Enrique W. Neblett, Sierra E. Carter

Abstract

To examine the protective effects of racial identity and Africentric worldview on the association between racial discrimination and blood pressure (BP).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 18%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 37%
Social Sciences 15 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,618,763
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Psychosomatic Medicine
#751
of 2,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,425
of 179,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychosomatic Medicine
#7
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.