You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The organizational social context of mental health services and clinician attitudes toward evidence-based practice: a United States national study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-56 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gregory A Aarons, Charles Glisson, Phillip D Green, Kimberly Hoagwood, Kelly J Kelleher, John A Landsverk, The Research Network on Youth Mental Health |
| Abstract |
ABSTBACKGROUND: Evidence-based practices have not been routinely adopted in community mental health organizations despite the support of scientific evidence and in some cases even legislative or regulatory action. We examined the association of clinician attitudes toward evidence-based practice with organizational culture, climate, and other characteristics in a nationally representative sample of mental health organizations in the United States. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 16% |
| Australia | 3 | 12% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 52% |
| Scientists | 9 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 253 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 39 | 15% |
| Researcher | 37 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 13% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 20% |
| Unknown | 42 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 80 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 55 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Unknown | 60 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2018.
All research outputs
#2,269,671
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#444
of 1,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,627
of 178,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.