↓ Skip to main content

Differential phosphoprofiles of EGF and EGFR kinase inhibitor-treated human tumor cells and mouse xenografts

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Proteomics, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential phosphoprofiles of EGF and EGFR kinase inhibitor-treated human tumor cells and mouse xenografts
Published in
Clinical Proteomics, March 2004
DOI 10.1385/cp:1:1:069
Authors

David R. Stover, Jennifer Caldwell, Jarrod Marto, Karen Root, Juergan Mestan, Michael Stumm, Olga Ornatsky, Chris Orsi, Nina Radosevic, Linda Liao, Doriano Fabbro, Michael F. Moran

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Student > Master 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 25%
Chemistry 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,610,236
of 23,203,401 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Proteomics
#92
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,203
of 55,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Proteomics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,203,401 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.