You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Economic impact of ME/CFS: Individual and societal costs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dynamic Medicine, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-5918-7-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leonard A Jason, Mary C Benton, Lisa Valentine, Abra Johnson, Susan Torres-Harding |
| Abstract |
ME/CFS is characterized by debilitating fatigue in addition to other physical and cognitive symptoms. It is estimated to affect over 800,000 adults in the U.S. ME/CFS often results in diminished functionality and increased economic impact. The economic impact of an illness is generally divided into two categories: direct and indirect costs. Despite high prevalence rates and the disabling nature of the illness, few studies have examined the costs of ME/CFS at the individual and societal level. In fact, of the four studies examining the economic impact of ME/ME/CFS only two used a U. S. sample. The current study used community and tertiary samples to examine the direct costs of ME/CFS. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 18 | 18% |
| Austria | 15 | 15% |
| United States | 7 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 55 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 88 | 88% |
| Scientists | 6 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 10% |
| Psychology | 10 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 25% |
| Unknown | 28 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#405,509
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Dynamic Medicine
#1
of 23 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#719
of 97,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dynamic Medicine
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one scored the same or higher as 22 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them