↓ Skip to main content

Ionotropic GABA receptors: modelling and design of selective ligands

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cheminformatics, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ionotropic GABA receptors: modelling and design of selective ligands
Published in
Journal of Cheminformatics, May 2010
DOI 10.1186/1758-2946-2-s1-p49
Authors

Vladimir A Palyulin, EV Radchenko, DE Osolodkin, VI Chupakhin, NS Zefirov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 2 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,610,236
of 23,203,401 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cheminformatics
#604
of 858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,894
of 96,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cheminformatics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,203,401 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.