| Title |
Opening the Wrong Gate? The Academic Spring and Scholarly Publishing in the Humanities and Social Sciences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Publishing Research Quarterly, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12109-012-9272-5 |
| Authors |
Casey Brienza |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 40% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 35% |
| Librarian | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 22 | 48% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,851,733
of 24,701,898 outputs
Outputs from Publishing Research Quarterly
#20
of 280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,903
of 167,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Publishing Research Quarterly
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them