You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: a realist review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01344-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma Coles, Julie Anderson, Margaret Maxwell, Fiona M. Harris, Nicola M. Gray, Gill Milner, Stephen MacGillivray |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 23% |
| Ireland | 3 | 14% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
| Scientists | 5 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 241 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 11% |
| Researcher | 17 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 18% |
| Unknown | 92 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 16 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 15% |
| Unknown | 99 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,299,048
of 25,386,051 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#183
of 2,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,433
of 382,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#2
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,386,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.