↓ Skip to main content

The importance of physiological ecology in conservation biology

Overview of attention for article published in Integrative & Comparative Biology, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The importance of physiological ecology in conservation biology
Published in
Integrative & Comparative Biology, October 2006
DOI 10.1093/icb/icl054
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. R. Tracy, K. E. Nussear, T. C. Esque, K. Dean-Bradley, C. R. Tracy, L. A. DeFalco, K. T. Castle, L. C. Zimmerman, R. E. Espinoza, A. M. Barber

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 5%
Brazil 5 3%
South Africa 2 1%
Mexico 2 1%
Malta 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 173 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 20%
Researcher 37 19%
Student > Master 34 17%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Professor 14 7%
Other 52 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 155 78%
Environmental Science 16 8%
Unspecified 15 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 7 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,130,874
of 12,352,780 outputs
Outputs from Integrative & Comparative Biology
#631
of 899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,794
of 270,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Integrative & Comparative Biology
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,352,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.