You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Class II malocclusion treatment changes with the Jones jig, Distal jet and First Class appliances
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0364 |
| Authors |
Lorena VILANOVA, José Fernando Castanha HENRIQUES, Mayara Paim PATEL, Rachelle Simões REIS, Roberto Henrique da Costa GREC, Aron ALIAGA-DEL CASTILLO, Silvio Augusto BELLINI-PEREIRA, Guilherme JANSON |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 17% |
| Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 44% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2020.
All research outputs
#18,720,769
of 23,204,238 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#284
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#335,027
of 457,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#23
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,204,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.