↓ Skip to main content

Twitter-based learning for continuing medical education?

Overview of attention for article published in European Heart Journal, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
246 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Twitter-based learning for continuing medical education?
Published in
European Heart Journal, April 2020
DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa346
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ritu Thamman, Martha Gulati, Akhil Narang, Audun Utengen, Mamas A Mamas, Deepak L Bhatt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 246 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 147. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2020.
All research outputs
#123,241
of 15,148,874 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal
#188
of 7,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,688
of 219,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal
#15
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,148,874 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.