You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ambivalent helpers and unhealthy choices: public health practitioners’ narratives of Indigenous ill-health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Science & Medicine, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.07.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma Kowal, Yin Paradies |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
| Researcher | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 29 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Psychology | 8 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Social Science & Medicine
#7,202
of 11,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,426
of 76,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Science & Medicine
#68
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.