You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A pilot study of the quality of informed consent materials for Aboriginal participants in clinical trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Ethics, August 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jme.2002.002279 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F M Russell, J R Carapetis, H Liddle, T Edwards, T A Ruff, J Devitt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malawi | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 29% |
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 31% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#2,346
of 3,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,601
of 68,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.