↓ Skip to main content

Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 37,708)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1920 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2758 Mendeley
Title
Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial
Published in
The Lancet, May 2020
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31022-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yeming Wang, Dingyu Zhang, Guanhua Du, Ronghui Du, Jianping Zhao, Yang Jin, Shouzhi Fu, Ling Gao, Zhenshun Cheng, Qiaofa Lu, Yi Hu, Guangwei Luo, Ke Wang, Yang Lu, Huadong Li, Shuzhen Wang, Shunan Ruan, Chengqing Yang, Chunlin Mei, Yi Wang, Dan Ding, Feng Wu, Xin Tang, Xianzhi Ye, Yingchun Ye, Bing Liu, Jie Yang, Wen Yin, Aili Wang, Guohui Fan, Fei Zhou, Zhibo Liu, Xiaoying Gu, Jiuyang Xu, Lianhan Shang, Yi Zhang, Lianjun Cao, Tingting Guo, Yan Wan, Hong Qin, Yushen Jiang, Thomas Jaki, Frederick G Hayden, Peter W Horby, Bin Cao, Chen Wang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14,001 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,758 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2758 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 382 14%
Researcher 355 13%
Student > Master 273 10%
Other 238 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 214 8%
Other 562 20%
Unknown 734 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 817 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 234 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 220 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 87 3%
Other 420 15%
Unknown 884 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11599. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2021.
All research outputs
#87
of 19,218,475 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#12
of 37,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18
of 288,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#4
of 387 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,218,475 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 387 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.