↓ Skip to main content

Regular long-term red blood cell transfusions for managing chronic chest complications in sickle cell disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regular long-term red blood cell transfusions for managing chronic chest complications in sickle cell disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008360.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lise J Estcourt, Sally Hopewell, Marialena Trivella, Ian R Hambleton, Gavin Cho

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 157 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Other 6 4%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 57 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 61 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,696,980
of 17,585,248 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,156
of 11,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,761
of 283,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,585,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.