| Title |
Treatment of patients with nonsevere and severe coronavirus disease 2019: an evidence-based guideline
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.200648 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhikang Ye, Bram Rochwerg, Ying Wang, Neill K Adhikari, Srinivas Murthy, François Lamontagne, Robert A Fowler, Haibo Qiu, Li Wei, Ling Sang, Mark Loeb, Ning Shen, Minhua Huang, Zhaonan Jiang, Yaseen M Arabi, Luis Enrique Colunga-Lozano, Li Jiang, Younsuck Koh, Dong Liu, Fang Liu, Jason Phua, Aizong Shen, Tianyi Huo, Bin Du, Suodi Zhai, Gordon H Guyatt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 198 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 22 | 11% |
| Spain | 21 | 11% |
| Japan | 14 | 7% |
| Mexico | 11 | 6% |
| United States | 8 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 3% |
| Argentina | 4 | 2% |
| Colombia | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 88 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 151 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 30 | 15% |
| Scientists | 15 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 329 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 18% |
| Researcher | 29 | 9% |
| Other | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 61 | 19% |
| Unknown | 111 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 32% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 28 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 12% |
| Unknown | 120 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 196. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2023.
All research outputs
#208,714
of 25,932,719 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#372
of 9,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,054
of 410,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#11
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,932,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.