You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of a diabetes education and behavioural weight management programme versus a diabetes education programme in adults with a recent diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: study protocol for the Glucose Lowering through Weight management (GLoW) randomised controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMJ Open, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035020 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amy L Ahern, Jenny Woolston, Emma Wells, Stephen J Sharp, Nazrul Islam, Emma Ruth Lawlor, Robbie Duschinsky, Andrew J Hill, Brett Doble, Ed Wilson, Stephen Morris, Carly A Hughes, Alan Brennan, Jennifer Bostock, Clare Boothby, Simon J Griffin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 71% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
Researcher | 13 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 15% |
Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 17 | 20% |
Unknown | 31 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,170,344
of 25,519,924 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#11,737
of 25,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,142
of 408,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#206
of 407 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,519,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 407 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.