↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of a diabetes education and behavioural weight management programme versus a diabetes education programme in adults with a recent diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: study…

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of a diabetes education and behavioural weight management programme versus a diabetes education programme in adults with a recent diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: study protocol for the Glucose Lowering through Weight management (GLoW) randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMJ Open, April 2020
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035020
Authors

Amy L Ahern, Jenny Woolston, Emma Wells, Stephen J Sharp, Nazrul Islam, Emma Ruth Lawlor, Robbie Duschinsky, Andrew J Hill, Brett Doble, Ed Wilson, Stephen Morris, Carly A Hughes, Alan Brennan, Jennifer Bostock, Clare Boothby, Simon J Griffin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Unspecified 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 20%
Unspecified 3 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 15%
Psychology 2 10%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 3 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,995,671
of 15,549,524 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#8,020
of 14,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,424
of 276,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#206
of 397 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,549,524 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 397 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.