↓ Skip to main content

Echographic evaluation of ICU patients with tissue Doppler imaging: more studies and more consensus are still needed

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Echographic evaluation of ICU patients with tissue Doppler imaging: more studies and more consensus are still needed
Published in
Critical Care, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/cc11377
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jérôme Fichet, Benjamin Sztrymf, Frédéric M Jacobs

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 24%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Other 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 82%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,036,925
of 9,233,965 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,085
of 3,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,534
of 96,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#99
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,233,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.