↓ Skip to main content

Boundless contamination and progress in Geography

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Human Geography, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 772)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
41 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
Boundless contamination and progress in Geography
Published in
Progress in Human Geography, April 2020
DOI 10.1177/0309132520920094
Authors

Noel Castree, Louise Amoore, Alex Hughes, Nina Laurie, David Manley, Susan Parnell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2020.
All research outputs
#552,689
of 15,435,723 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Human Geography
#19
of 772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,386
of 275,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Human Geography
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,435,723 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.