↓ Skip to main content

Female attractiveness affects paternal investment: experimental evidence for male differential allocation in blue tits

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 667)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Female attractiveness affects paternal investment: experimental evidence for male differential allocation in blue tits
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-9-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharina Mahr, Matteo Griggio, Michela Granatiero, Herbert Hoi

Abstract

The differential allocation hypothesis (DAH) predicts that individuals should adjust their parental investment to their current mate's quality. Although in principle the DAH holds for both sexes, male adjustment of parental investment has only been tested in a few experimental studies, revealing contradictory results. We conducted a field experiment to test whether male blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) allocate their parental effort in relation to female ornamentation (ultraviolet colouration of the crown), as predicted by the DAH.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 78 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 25%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 64%
Environmental Science 6 7%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2014.
All research outputs
#523,232
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#30
of 667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,566
of 166,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them