↓ Skip to main content

Surgical adhesives

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

1 patent


21 Dimensions

Readers on

13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Surgical adhesives
Published in
Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins, December 2001
DOI 10.1590/s0104-79302001000200002


Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 46%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 38%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
of 14,787,109 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins
of 21 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 132,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,787,109 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them