@lonnibesancon @Beatrice_Rosen @Emma___Palmer La preuve, celui-ci, https://t.co/Pk6d6XnG8X publié le 1er mai par la même équipe dans le NEJM à partir de la même base de données imaginaire n'aurait jamais été rétracté sans l'affaire du #Lancetgate. 2/3
@Oliviersanstom @GValeau @YannickDahomey @MartineRsx @Tarawinterr @LockwoodIngers1 @Georges_Brum @SDavodeau @JrmeBrwnCt @MartinZ_uncut https://t.co/5rwcEcFgA6 Data de Surgisphere. Ca ira ?
RT @myopinionsquare: Interesting to see you in new @NEJM that statins were associated with improved survival with #COVIDー19 but CAD increa…
@rynex20 @NorthBuster1 Il va falloir vous réveiller un jour. https://t.co/R2VOE6WscK https://t.co/q6HZAqTRoi
@lonnibesancon L'étude en question https://t.co/tRg5mPiQTW
@scientistabe Here's some anti-science that was fasttracked at Lancet in 2020. https://t.co/ompGor9QMu and another fasttracked at NEJM https://t.co/HH6s24ywoa
@nickmmark @catoletters When formerly prestigious medical journals publish phony studies, the public loses confidence in all scientific and medical studies. Here are two examples of phony studies. https://t.co/LfDeIX4Wmj https://t.co/YXWQo8Pwht
@AriDavidPaul @ettoredn @X_Refugee69 @julianhosp @joerogan Or maybe this one? https://t.co/kMpy9ClRGv
@2ndfor1st So nobody told him. The (later retracted) bogus Surgisphere NEJM paper came out June 18 that year. They moved as fast as they could. https://t.co/e8UEeRSF61
RT @AbhirupMD: @DrLiver @TheLancet @harvardmed @MRMehraMD Especially @NEJM should look into this. And this should be retracted https://t.co…
RT @normanpie: Dla ciekawych, Tu są linki do prac, które dyskutuję powyżej. https://t.co/AZNvdkfBTl https://t.co/US4Z9DfZUO
RT @normanpie: Dla ciekawych, Tu są linki do prac, które dyskutuję powyżej. https://t.co/AZNvdkfBTl https://t.co/US4Z9DfZUO
RT @normanpie: Dla ciekawych, Tu są linki do prac, które dyskutuję powyżej. https://t.co/AZNvdkfBTl https://t.co/US4Z9DfZUO
Dla ciekawych, Tu są linki do prac, które dyskutuję powyżej. https://t.co/AZNvdkfBTl https://t.co/US4Z9DfZUO
RT @LaMadreDeSatan: Pues bien: el 01.05.20 (sólo seis semanas mas tarde, qué rapidez) se publica un estudio en el NEJM (junto con The Lance…
Pues bien: el 01.05.20 (sólo seis semanas mas tarde, qué rapidez) se publica un estudio en el NEJM (junto con The Lancet y el BMJ, el Top3) que alerta de las enfermedades cardiovasculares como factor de complicación del ingreso por covid. 5/20 https://t.
@tdgch (HCQ) "remède au Covid-19, malgré les preuves du contraire" quelles preuves, celles exhibées dans le papier bidonné puis rétracté du Lancet https://t.co/ADa7bnKyeN? sérieusement, il faut étayer vos propos @tdgch ...
RT @1foreverseeking: @HousatonicLive Retracted... https://t.co/nuFHenlaa4 https://t.co/4umTzMDnMx
@Lord_Bransty @mlperk1 @TheRadicalShow @MaajidNawaz @OdyseeTeam Oh. You mean this? https://t.co/VsbcMXt402 Absolutely not hydroxychloroquine. Also, not THEIR study. They didnt write it. "Will not" is based on the available evidence at the time, which I sh
@JocelynEKing @Cannamama3 @aaronhoyland @JustinTrudeau Or the use of Fraudulent data sets (one Australian hospital had more deaths than total pop. Of Australia https://t.co/z9MylqDpUA https://t.co/6a2Y4pxxq3 This got HCQ revoked. /4
RT @leandrotessler: No início da pandemia duas retrataçõs foram muito comentadas. Dois artigos que passaram por revisão por pares em periód…
A ciência tarda, mas se corrige.
RT @leandrotessler: No início da pandemia duas retrataçõs foram muito comentadas. Dois artigos que passaram por revisão por pares em periód…
@Heinzeoficial o defensor da cloroquina na CPI da COVID. Esse mesmo que quer ser governador do RS. Todos os dias 15 minutos de propaganda validando o tratcov.
No início da pandemia duas retrataçõs foram muito comentadas. Dois artigos que passaram por revisão por pares em periódicos de alto prestígio eram baseados em dados forjados. 2/11 https://t.co/jF56bC9Qv6 https://t.co/oU4jiTxV5W
@_room103 @lknur39609929 @sgokbakar Hemen kanıt yollarmısın. Bilimsel çalışma ve istatistik!Öyle sallayınca doğru olmuyor Asıl covid bağlantılı kalp krizleri arttı. Al Bak bilimsel çalışma. kalbini kırarım senin.Ben 10 gün hastanede kaldım, arkadaşım Sinan
RT @RemondAlex4: @boutaour @raoult_didier @andrebercoff @SudRadio C’est en ligne mais marqué rétracté https://t.co/zGOMi6EoL3 A la différ…
@de_l_epoque @boutaour @raoult_didier @andrebercoff @SudRadio C’est marqué rétracté https://t.co/zGOMi6EoL3 L’étude de Raoult est toujours en ligne et c’est pourtant trafiqué 🤦♀️
@boutaour @raoult_didier @andrebercoff @SudRadio C’est en ligne mais marqué rétracté https://t.co/zGOMi6EoL3 A la différence de l’étude de Raoult qui est toujours en ligne dans le journal de son pote alors que c’est étude trafiquée et démontrée 🤦♀️
@seanonolennon 8/ credible and this may be one of the major factors for failure of many agents." Then we have the other study that was used to claim HCQ was not effective - https://t.co/zrElKYyIu3 and https://t.co/pOqKd1FGfC
RT @PanDanTag: L'article rétracté https://t.co/m76XZsThx0
L'article rétracté https://t.co/m76XZsThx0
@systemanalysen @NEJM hab da jetzt nicht so viel spannendes drin gefunden🤔 https://t.co/xBsP6KUroM
RT @cravecreative: @EdwinRankin Like this Lancet article which they were forced to retract due to inaccuracies in data? https://t.co/mChgfx…
@EdwinRankin Like this Lancet article which they were forced to retract due to inaccuracies in data? https://t.co/mChgfx6HWJ Like the New England Journal of Medicine for a study they were forced to retract b/c they wrongly stated the origins of data collec
@raoult_didier @Tredaniel @TheLancet @pierrejovanovic @franceinfo @lemondefr @JFJagle @Le_Figaro @aragon_jb RT @aragon_jb: .."article publié début mai dans "The NEJM", les auteurs avaient déjà publié le même type de table de données sur les continents avec
Maybe because of this? https://t.co/WjALkTSJbi 👇👇👇👇👇 https://t.co/LLKfiZlHvH
RT @arkmedic: @Rob_Ruadh @iabfe @MayoClinic @NEJM That article doesn't say that And the one I was referencing (which was fake) was https:/…
@EmilioAQ6 @jordanbpeterson Since I have your attention, and since you're speaking of a good versus bad quality study, what would your analysis be of this one? Look at the verbage. https://t.co/teev06HKtn
@payliina1975 @OKuokka @naughty05862332 @HNohynek @mika_salminen @THLorg @OssiTiihonen @WHO Mekta, @NEJM, retracted. https://t.co/FAiPTEG8T4
"That hypothesis has since collapsed. A series of large epidemiological studies looking at Covid-19 patients on these drugs found them to be harmless." The studies used observational databases. "Our study confirmed previous observations suggesting..." h
RT @TerriersVu: They FAKED TWO STUDIES. I can’t emphasized how rare this is in medicine and in the most prestigious medical journals in the…
RT @TerriersVu: They FAKED TWO STUDIES. I can’t emphasized how rare this is in medicine and in the most prestigious medical journals in the…
RT @boticariors: Hoy ya nadie se acuerda de #Surgisphere https://t.co/fd5xrqZU6u https://t.co/mA71fm0ed6
RT @boticariors: Ha sido todo una carrera, un río revuelto con mucho que ganar pero también que perder. Y algunos pescaron en ese río. Y ta…
Hoy ya nadie se acuerda de #Surgisphere https://t.co/fd5xrqZU6u https://t.co/mA71fm0ed6
Ha sido todo una carrera, un río revuelto con mucho que ganar pero también que perder. Y algunos pescaron en ese río. Y tanto pescaron que los que manejan las corrientes https://t.co/mIup1v5dVa
La même équipe a publié un autre article dans le NEJM, lui aussi basé sur des données de Surgisphère, affirmant que les maladies cardiovasculaires augmentaient le risque de mourir du covid, et que les IEC et les ARA-2 ne modifiaient pas le pronostic. http
No solo eso sino que el mismo autor (Sapan Desai) publicó otro trabajo (en el New England Journal of Medicine) que decía que las terapias con drogas no tenían ningún resultado. Ese estudio también era falso y fue retractado. https://t.co/BaFPjgi6jI
Cardiovascular Disease, Drug Therapy, and Mortality in Covid-19 | NEJM https://t.co/yXD7TCX6SF
@mav_pranjal @Brahamvakya Lancet & NeJM published and later retracted a fake study saying HCQ is not effective. https://t.co/nLwvCbCNU5 Company behind the study was Surgisphere. Span Desai and Mandeep Mehra being two of the authors. Yes Indians, Jaich
RT @carpe_diem0820: イベルメクチンがCOVID-19に有効との報告(pre-print)は、米国データベース会社による捏造の可能性 NEJM, Lancetの掲載論文も https://t.co/ZqDTwQbgDb https://t.co/5SVkb…
RT @HealthFreedomIE: For the further attention of Dr. @illonaduffy. https://t.co/cKDc3rCYex https://t.co/pcmC9ADlIW
RT @HealthFreedomIE: For the further attention of Dr. @illonaduffy. https://t.co/cKDc3rCYex https://t.co/pcmC9ADlIW
RT @HealthFreedomIE: For the further attention of Dr. @illonaduffy. https://t.co/cKDc3rCYex https://t.co/pcmC9ADlIW
RT @HealthFreedomIE: For the further attention of Dr. @illonaduffy. https://t.co/cKDc3rCYex https://t.co/pcmC9ADlIW
For the further attention of Dr. @illonaduffy. https://t.co/cKDc3rCYex https://t.co/pcmC9ADlIW
2/ We have seen @TheLancet & @NEJM retract articles regarding COVID after the articles were dissected by readers post-publication who called foul on Surgisphere & the conjured "data". https://t.co/0fJKvEr5Tj https://t.co/DrSxZ8QS20
RT @nicomedbxl: @MaartenvSmeden Same for their retracted @nejm paper. Cited 719 times https://t.co/d7wAvcyznn
RT @nicomedbxl: @MaartenvSmeden Same for their retracted @nejm paper. Cited 719 times https://t.co/d7wAvcyznn
@Luis_Corral_Gud Muy sonado fue lo de @TheLancet y la HCQ o el @NEJM y el riesgo CV, y aquella BBDD de #Surgisphere. Puso de manifiesto q las prisas no son buenas consejeras. Especial preocupación, el daño que se pudo hacer con la HCQ... https://t.co/mA7
@dawso007 This also comes to mind. Whatever came of this mess? https://t.co/qZtqkEM6kx
RT @numbers97413: @MarkChangizi NEJM continues to disgrace their legacy. This used to be one of the most trusted medical journal in the wor…
Y si no les convence, sólo recuerden bien este escándalo de un estudio hecho con datos falsos, publicado en la revista más prestigiada: https://t.co/fAQIqmkQwV
@cat_coronavirus @nancystruth @Wx_QuiK_ @AssisT_styx @charliekirk11 I can’t tell from this if you are referencing the NEJM article that has since been retracted for falsifying data https://t.co/I6eLWib1uZ
@RRalstonAgile Never forget he had "elective" triple bypass for CAD, roughly 17 years ago. What's weird is Senator Frist, his predecessor, counseled him to do so. What do we know in 2020? Avoid *elective bypass at all costs. Also, COVID=Vascular https://t
RT @IZPwKrakowie: 🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭Dodatkowo warto przypomnieć, że palenie papierosów prawie dwukrotnie zwiększa ryzyko zgonu w przebiegu #COVI…
RT @IZPwKrakowie: 🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭Dodatkowo warto przypomnieć, że palenie papierosów prawie dwukrotnie zwiększa ryzyko zgonu w przebiegu #COVI…
RT @IZPwKrakowie: 🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭Dodatkowo warto przypomnieć, że palenie papierosów prawie dwukrotnie zwiększa ryzyko zgonu w przebiegu #COVI…
🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭🚭Dodatkowo warto przypomnieć, że palenie papierosów prawie dwukrotnie zwiększa ryzyko zgonu w przebiegu #COVID19 https://t.co/sAnnhsCoBL
Hey the study that formed the basis of this article was retracted, are you guys ever going to update this article to reflect that? https://t.co/aiH2VNkukH ^ Study in question https://t.co/OEUhHSx60i via @CBSHealth
Too funny.
@rschon @MarkLSeeley Roger, the NEJM retracted study had nothing to do with hydroxychloroquine. It was about ACE inhibitors and ARBs, the aggregation of data from health records, and access to data by the investigators. But your overall point/question is s
@Cindela_Oculary @jj1979 @AA_Burnett @JuliansRum Here is another article MSM and Democrats used to counter HCQ, which has been retracted : https://t.co/1BivrSub5L
@MarkChangizi NEJM continues to disgrace their legacy. This used to be one of the most trusted medical journal in the world. Now it has become a platform for political propagandists. Also NEJM, peer reviewed science fraud: https://t.co/0cVc8F2ZXY
(Part 2) ACE Inhibitors, which are drugs used to treat #highbloodpressure do not appear to increase death risk in #COVID19 patients. See the original study from @NEJM https://t.co/7ugRcFOYPy https://t.co/40mrguLonQ
(2 Parter) #Bloodpressure drugs known as ACE Inhibitors do not appear to increase the risk of death among #COVID19 patients. See the original study from @NEJM https://t.co/7ugRcFOYPy https://t.co/G5yHoaK2Y4
RT @SophiaQu: Hi guys! This is my first tweet for my Science Communication course at Cornell :) #CuSciStory Looking forward to engaging in…
Hi guys! This is my first tweet for my Science Communication course at Cornell :) #CuSciStory Looking forward to engaging in more digital platforms and expanding my scientific literacy 😁 Follow this thread to learn more about this retracted paper I read:
ありゃ・・・撤回になっとる。 明後日の発表スライドに引用してたのに・・・(´・ω・`) ナンテコッタ💦 Cardiovascular Disease, Drug Therapy, and Mortality in Covid-19 https://t.co/lOxhIowXoh
Just a reminder of what one of the most prestigious medical journals: The New England Journal of Medicine published as "peer reviewed" at the height of the "2020 covid pandemic". NEJM was forced to retract. This is outright fraudulent science: https://t.co
@hocfraus @hgbarraza @dilemasclasicos @MerlinaAcevedo @nexosmexico Este artículo ilustra los factores de riesgo de manera muy clara https://t.co/6hwyAFXbTb
NEJM study used toxic doses https://t.co/ELtoRsjGlg
@furusatochan @timobobby1 詳しいデータはインフルエンザの方がないはずです。基となる感染者数カウントの背景が異なるのでクリアカットな比較は困難ですが、コロナの致死率が比較すると高いのは複数の論文(たとえば添付)で指摘されていますので、人工呼吸器装着下での比較は無意味かと思います。 https://t.co/ASWyi0ZScP
Cardiovascular Disease, Drug Therapy, and Mortality in Covid-19 - https://t.co/oj1z87YYw2 https://t.co/wKWbbBlAkk
RT @osenbei_chan: コロナウイルスは、女性の方が死ぬリスクが小さいことはかなり言われてきているが、それ以上に、高血圧治療薬ACE阻害剤や高脂血症治療薬スタチン系薬剤の服用者が死ぬリスク小さい。#コロナウイルス https://t.co/kZ86YtrHzG
RT @phil_w888: 13/ 1536 patients at 169 hospitals (121 in US, 48 in 10 other countries) "5.5% were current smokers" Smoking rates in all…
RT @osenbei_chan: コロナウイルスは、女性の方が死ぬリスクが小さいことはかなり言われてきているが、それ以上に、高血圧治療薬ACE阻害剤や高脂血症治療薬スタチン系薬剤の服用者が死ぬリスク小さい。#コロナウイルス https://t.co/kZ86YtrHzG