The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of two methods for purification of plantaricin ST31, a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST31
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, June 2004
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1517-83822004000100026 |
Authors |
Svetoslav D. Todorov, Manuela Vaz-Velho, Paul Gibbs |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Kazakhstan | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 62 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 17% |
Researcher | 9 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Other | 13 | 21% |
Unknown | 9 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 46% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 13% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 10% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
#206
of 1,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,859
of 62,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,377 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.