You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Produção de biomassa e teores de carbono, hidrogênio, nitrogênio e proteína em microalgas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência Rural, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0103-84782009000600019 |
| Authors |
Silvana Ohse, Roberto Bianchini Derner, Renata Ávila Ozório, Maurício Villela Da Costa Braga, Paulo Cunha, Cláudia Pavan Lamarca, Márcia Estevão Dos Santos |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 31% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 23% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#179
of 2,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,784
of 103,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them