↓ Skip to main content

The healthy options for nutrition environments in schools (Healthy ONES) group randomized trial: using implementation models to change nutrition policy and environments in low income schools

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The healthy options for nutrition environments in schools (Healthy ONES) group randomized trial: using implementation models to change nutrition policy and environments in low income schools
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-9-80
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen J Coleman, Maggie Shordon, Susan L Caparosa, Magdalena E Pomichowski, David A Dzewaltowski

Abstract

The Healthy Options for Nutrition Environments in Schools (Healthy ONES) study was an evidence-based public health (EBPH) randomized group trial that adapted the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's (IHI) rapid improvement process model to implement school nutrition policy and environmental change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 268 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 26%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 29 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 56 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 15%
Social Sciences 35 13%
Psychology 19 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 6%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 64 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2012.
All research outputs
#3,373,867
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,111
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,666
of 177,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#10
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.