↓ Skip to main content

Provably good planar mappings

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Provably good planar mappings
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2014
DOI 10.1145/2601097.2601123
Authors

Roi Poranne, Yaron Lipman

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 29%
Student > Master 6 17%
Professor 4 11%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 22 63%
Engineering 3 9%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,966,557
of 15,766,038 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#724
of 1,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,687
of 281,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,766,038 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.