↓ Skip to main content

Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008361.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aleksandar Nagorni, Goran Bjelakovic, Bratislav Petrovic

Abstract

It has been suggested that narrow band imaging colonoscopy (NBI) might be better for detection of colorectal polyps than white light colonoscopy (WLC).

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Master 12 16%
Other 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Other 22 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 62%
Unspecified 14 19%
Engineering 5 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 4 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2016.
All research outputs
#11,143,390
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,923
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,141
of 118,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.