↓ Skip to main content

Novel insights into serodiagnosis and epidemiology of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae, a newly recognized pathogen in muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus)

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel insights into serodiagnosis and epidemiology of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae, a newly recognized pathogen in muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus)
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2020
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0231724
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabien Mavrot, Karin Orsel, Wendy Hutchins, Layne G. Adams, Kimberlee Beckmen, John E. Blake, Sylvia L. Checkley, Tracy Davison, Juliette Di Francesco, Brett Elkin, Lisa-Marie Leclerc, Angela Schneider, Matilde Tomaselli, Susan J. Kutz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 12%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 53%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#10,116,403
of 16,579,356 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#91,226
of 161,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,877
of 279,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#79
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,579,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.