↓ Skip to main content

Simulating articulated subspace self-contact

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simulating articulated subspace self-contact
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2014
DOI 10.1145/2601097.2601181
Authors

Yun Teng, Miguel A. Otaduy, Theodore Kim

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,665,188
of 14,995,637 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#707
of 1,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,839
of 152,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,995,637 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them