↓ Skip to main content

It’s a long, long walk: accessibility to hospitals, maternity and integrated health centers in Niger

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
It’s a long, long walk: accessibility to hospitals, maternity and integrated health centers in Niger
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-11-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justine I Blanford, Supriya Kumar, Wei Luo, Alan M MacEachren

Abstract

Ease of access to health care is of great importance in any country but particularly in countries such as Niger where restricted access can put people at risk of mortality from diseases such as measles, meningitis, polio, pneumonia and malaria. This paper analyzes the physical access of populations to health facilities within Niger with an emphasis on the effect of seasonal conditions and the implications of these conditions in terms of availability of adequate health services, provision of drugs and vaccinations. The majority of the transport within Niger is pedestrian, thus the paper emphasizes access by those walking to facilities for care. Further analysis compared the change in accessibility for vehicular travel since public health workers do travel by vehicle when carrying out vaccination campaigns and related proactive health care activities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 347 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 19%
Researcher 49 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 9%
Student > Postgraduate 22 6%
Other 61 17%
Unknown 76 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 50 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 14%
Engineering 33 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 9%
Environmental Science 20 6%
Other 81 23%
Unknown 92 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,609,397
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#85
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,206
of 177,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.