You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Negative chromatography of hepatitis B virus-like particle: Comparative study of different adsorbent designs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Chromatography A, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.03.066 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Micky Fu Xiang Lee, Eng Seng Chan, Wen Siang Tan, Kam Chiu Tam, Beng Ti Tey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 9 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
| Engineering | 5 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,804,094
of 23,205,257 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chromatography A
#926
of 12,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,338
of 299,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chromatography A
#7
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,205,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,602 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.