↓ Skip to main content

Blastocystis: past pitfalls and future perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Parasitology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blastocystis: past pitfalls and future perspectives
Published in
Trends in Parasitology, June 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.pt.2012.05.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pauline D. Scanlan

Abstract

Blastocystis is a genetically heterogeneous protist found in the intestinal tract (IT) of many vertebrates, and although it is implicated in a variety of human intestinal disorders, data regarding the clinical relevance of Blastocystis is at best speculative. Several research issues, including a lack of standardization across studies, the potential for intrasubtype variation in pathogenicity, and difficulties associated with diagnostics for many idiopathic disorders of the human IT have led to conflicting reports in support of a role for Blastocystis pathogenicity. Here, several research areas and methodologies are reviewed that if integrated appropriately into a prospective study may prove useful and facilitate a better understanding of the role of Blastocystis in human health and disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 107 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 26 24%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 26 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,297,220
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Parasitology
#341
of 2,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,034
of 177,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Parasitology
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.